Rethinking Power and Authority: Symbolic Violence and Subjectivity in Nepal's Terai Forests
Identifieur interne : 000146 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000145; suivant : 000147Rethinking Power and Authority: Symbolic Violence and Subjectivity in Nepal's Terai Forests
Auteurs : Andrea J. Nightingale ; Hemant R. Ojha [Australie]Source :
- Development and Change [ 0012-155X ] ; 2013-01.
English descriptors
- Teeft :
- Adroit publishers, Agrawal, Antecedent forms, Aphno maanche, Appropriate resources, Authoritative forms, Bourdieu, Cambridge university press, Case study, Caste, Certain forms, Change lund, Civil society, Claim authority, Climate change, Collaborative, Collaborative forest management, Collaborative forestry management, Collective action, Community forest, Community forestry, Community forestry user groups, Community forests, Community participation, Community rights, Contentious, Contentious politics, Contestation, Cultural codes, Cultural recognition, Developmentalist, Developmentalist codes, Different forms, Different groups, District forest, Doxa, Everyday practices, Exercise authority, Exercise power laterally, Fecofun, Feminist, Feminist theories, Feudalistic, Feudalistic codes, Forest conservation, Forest governance, Forest management, Forest products, Forest resources, Forestry, Forestry governance, Forestry management, Forestry policy, Forestry sector, Foucault, Gender, Governance, Hemant, High value, Institutional choice, Institutional forms, International crisis group, International institute, International journal, Iron triangle, Kathmandu, Khadka, Livelihoods nightingale, Local communities, Local democracy, Local politics, Lund, Middle hills, Mountain research, Natural resource management, Natural resources, Nepal, Nightingale, Ojha, Older forms, Ostrom, Other forms, Other institutions, Other words, Overseas development institute, Partial commitment, Particular subjectivities, Patronage politics, Paudel, Peluso, Political agency, Polity press, Power relations, Powerful people, Programme, Public authority, Radical politics, Recent work, Resource, Resource access, Ribot, Round table, Social agents, Social capital, Social change, Social inequality, Social interactions, Social movements, Stanford university press, State formation, Strategic interests, Subjection, Subjectivity, Symbolic violence, Technical forestry, Technocratic, Terai, Terai forestry, Terai forests, Terai groups, Twilight institutions, User, User groups, Villager, Vintage books.
Abstract
Recent work on authority, power and the state has opened up important avenues of inquiry into the practices and contexts through which power is exercised. Why certain forms of authority emerge as more durable and legitimate than others remains a challenge, however. In this article we bring together two bodies of thought to engage this issue, feminist theories of power and subjectivity and Bourdieu's ideas of symbolic violence, in order to explore how power and authority are reproduced and entrenched. Our purpose is to advance theorizing on power and authority in the context of contentious political situations and institutional emergence. This unusual theoretical synergy allows us to illustrate how power is exercised in relation to natural resource management and the ways in which the conflict/post‐conflict context creates institutional forms and spaces which simultaneously challenge and reinforce antecedent forms of authority. To animate our theoretical concerns, we draw on work in community‐based forestry in Nepal, with a focus on some of the conflicts that have arisen in relation to the valuable Sal forests of the Terai, or lowland plains.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/dech.12004
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000B24
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000A68
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000031
- to stream Main, to step Merge: 000146
- to stream Main, to step Curation: 000146
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Rethinking Power and Authority: Symbolic Violence and Subjectivity in Nepal's Terai Forests</title><author><name sortKey="Nightingale, Andrea J" sort="Nightingale, Andrea J" uniqKey="Nightingale A" first="Andrea J." last="Nightingale">Andrea J. Nightingale</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ojha, Hemant R" sort="Ojha, Hemant R" uniqKey="Ojha H" first="Hemant R." last="Ojha">Hemant R. Ojha</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:6A159BB6869307EF51E719CD1F772FF128D01571</idno><date when="2013" year="2013">2013</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/dech.12004</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/6A159BB6869307EF51E719CD1F772FF128D01571/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000B24</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000B24</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000A68</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000031</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000031</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0012-155X:2013:Nightingale A:rethinking:power:and</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000146</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000146</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000146</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Rethinking Power and Authority: Symbolic Violence and Subjectivity in Nepal's Terai Forests</title><author><name sortKey="Nightingale, Andrea J" sort="Nightingale, Andrea J" uniqKey="Nightingale A" first="Andrea J." last="Nightingale">Andrea J. Nightingale</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">management.</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ojha, Hemant R" sort="Ojha, Hemant R" uniqKey="Ojha H" first="Hemant R." last="Ojha">Hemant R. Ojha</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><orgName type="university">Université de Melbourne</orgName><country>Australie</country><placeName><settlement type="city">Melbourne</settlement><region type="état">Victoria (État)</region></placeName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Development and Change</title><idno type="ISSN">0012-155X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-7660</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2013-01">2013-01</date><biblScope unit="volume">44</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="29">29</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="51">51</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0012-155X</idno></series><idno type="istex">6A159BB6869307EF51E719CD1F772FF128D01571</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/dech.12004</idno><idno type="ArticleID">DECH12004</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0012-155X</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="Teeft" xml:lang="en"><term>Adroit publishers</term><term>Agrawal</term><term>Antecedent forms</term><term>Aphno maanche</term><term>Appropriate resources</term><term>Authoritative forms</term><term>Bourdieu</term><term>Cambridge university press</term><term>Case study</term><term>Caste</term><term>Certain forms</term><term>Change lund</term><term>Civil society</term><term>Claim authority</term><term>Climate change</term><term>Collaborative</term><term>Collaborative forest management</term><term>Collaborative forestry management</term><term>Collective action</term><term>Community forest</term><term>Community forestry</term><term>Community forestry user groups</term><term>Community forests</term><term>Community participation</term><term>Community rights</term><term>Contentious</term><term>Contentious politics</term><term>Contestation</term><term>Cultural codes</term><term>Cultural recognition</term><term>Developmentalist</term><term>Developmentalist codes</term><term>Different forms</term><term>Different groups</term><term>District forest</term><term>Doxa</term><term>Everyday practices</term><term>Exercise authority</term><term>Exercise power laterally</term><term>Fecofun</term><term>Feminist</term><term>Feminist theories</term><term>Feudalistic</term><term>Feudalistic codes</term><term>Forest conservation</term><term>Forest governance</term><term>Forest management</term><term>Forest products</term><term>Forest resources</term><term>Forestry</term><term>Forestry governance</term><term>Forestry management</term><term>Forestry policy</term><term>Forestry sector</term><term>Foucault</term><term>Gender</term><term>Governance</term><term>Hemant</term><term>High value</term><term>Institutional choice</term><term>Institutional forms</term><term>International crisis group</term><term>International institute</term><term>International journal</term><term>Iron triangle</term><term>Kathmandu</term><term>Khadka</term><term>Livelihoods nightingale</term><term>Local communities</term><term>Local democracy</term><term>Local politics</term><term>Lund</term><term>Middle hills</term><term>Mountain research</term><term>Natural resource management</term><term>Natural resources</term><term>Nepal</term><term>Nightingale</term><term>Ojha</term><term>Older forms</term><term>Ostrom</term><term>Other forms</term><term>Other institutions</term><term>Other words</term><term>Overseas development institute</term><term>Partial commitment</term><term>Particular subjectivities</term><term>Patronage politics</term><term>Paudel</term><term>Peluso</term><term>Political agency</term><term>Polity press</term><term>Power relations</term><term>Powerful people</term><term>Programme</term><term>Public authority</term><term>Radical politics</term><term>Recent work</term><term>Resource</term><term>Resource access</term><term>Ribot</term><term>Round table</term><term>Social agents</term><term>Social capital</term><term>Social change</term><term>Social inequality</term><term>Social interactions</term><term>Social movements</term><term>Stanford university press</term><term>State formation</term><term>Strategic interests</term><term>Subjection</term><term>Subjectivity</term><term>Symbolic violence</term><term>Technical forestry</term><term>Technocratic</term><term>Terai</term><term>Terai forestry</term><term>Terai forests</term><term>Terai groups</term><term>Twilight institutions</term><term>User</term><term>User groups</term><term>Villager</term><term>Vintage books</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Recent work on authority, power and the state has opened up important avenues of inquiry into the practices and contexts through which power is exercised. Why certain forms of authority emerge as more durable and legitimate than others remains a challenge, however. In this article we bring together two bodies of thought to engage this issue, feminist theories of power and subjectivity and Bourdieu's ideas of symbolic violence, in order to explore how power and authority are reproduced and entrenched. Our purpose is to advance theorizing on power and authority in the context of contentious political situations and institutional emergence. This unusual theoretical synergy allows us to illustrate how power is exercised in relation to natural resource management and the ways in which the conflict/post‐conflict context creates institutional forms and spaces which simultaneously challenge and reinforce antecedent forms of authority. To animate our theoretical concerns, we draw on work in community‐based forestry in Nepal, with a focus on some of the conflicts that have arisen in relation to the valuable Sal forests of the Terai, or lowland plains.</div></front></TEI><affiliations><list><country><li>Australie</li></country><region><li>Victoria (État)</li></region><settlement><li>Melbourne</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université de Melbourne</li></orgName></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Nightingale, Andrea J" sort="Nightingale, Andrea J" uniqKey="Nightingale A" first="Andrea J." last="Nightingale">Andrea J. Nightingale</name></noCountry><country name="Australie"><region name="Victoria (État)"><name sortKey="Ojha, Hemant R" sort="Ojha, Hemant R" uniqKey="Ojha H" first="Hemant R." last="Ojha">Hemant R. Ojha</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Sarre/explor/MusicSarreV3/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000146 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000146 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Sarre
|area= MusicSarreV3
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:6A159BB6869307EF51E719CD1F772FF128D01571
|texte= Rethinking Power and Authority: Symbolic Violence and Subjectivity in Nepal's Terai Forests
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.33. |  |